Structured disagreement as a simulation method.
MiniFiche routes your scenario through 12 expert agent personas simultaneously. Each agent operates with a fixed worldview, bias structure, and domain lens. Output is synthesized into a structured intelligence report — not averaged, but mapped across points of conflict and agreement.
Scenario simulation through structured disagreement
A single model gives you one perspective. MiniFiche runs your scenario through 12 distinct cognitive architectures in parallel. The synthesis maps where they conflict and what that conflict reveals about viability, risk, and opportunity.
Any business scenario, any domain
Product decisions, pricing moves, market entry, investor positioning, competitor response. If it involves judgment under uncertainty, structured agent disagreement adds signal.
Structured output, not editorial
Sentiment score, confidence rating, objection mapping, opportunity mapping, market signal analysis, recommended focus vector. Derived from agent disagreement — not from what sounds good.
| 01 | Skeptical Small Business Owner | risk_averse · roi_focused |
| 02 | Early Adopter / Tech Enthusiast | high_optimism · adoption_bias |
| 03 | Price-Sensitive Budget Buyer | cost_first · frugal_lens |
| 04 | Competitor's Product Manager | strategic · adversarial |
| 05 | Financial Analyst | unit_economics · churn_model |
| 06 | Marketing Strategist | positioning · gtm_focus |
| 07 | Venture Capitalist | scalability · exit_thesis |
| 08 | Enterprise CTO | security · integration_risk |
| 09 | Burned Founder | failure_pattern · distribution_skeptic |
| 10 | Customer Support Lead | edge_case · friction_mapping |
| 11 | Regulatory & Legal Advisor | compliance · liability_surface |
| 12 | Target End User | lived_experience · utility_first |